How often do three Lotto Max numbers share a block of ten?
Three or more Lotto Max numbers have landed in the same block of ten in 59.4% of draws, where chance predicts 61.3%.
The pool splits into 6 blocks of ten, the last one short, and 7 numbers are drawn, so a block holding three of them is crowded but ordinary: it has happened 759 times in 1,277 draws against a predicted 782.3. Four in one block is the rarer sight, seen 153 times against 144.9.
What was measured blocks of ten
The pool is cut at every tenth number: 01 to 10, 11 to 20, and so on. Each draw is sorted into those blocks and the biggest of the counts is kept. A draw holding 030709 plus four numbers spread elsewhere has a biggest cluster of 3.
Blocks are not all the same size. The last one holds whatever is left over, so it is 2 numbers wide rather than ten, and a narrow block cannot hold a crowd. Every predicted figure here is computed from each draw's own pool, with that draw's own block sizes, and then added up. This game has drawn from 3 pool sizes, 49 to 50 to 52 numbers, so the blocks have changed shape over the record and that correction matters here.
The record 1,277 draws
Red marks a figure outside the range ordinary variation produces
| Biggest cluster | Draws | Share | Chance | SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 518 | 40.56% | 38.74% | +1.34 |
| 3 | 606 | 47.45% | 49.91% | -1.76 |
| 4 | 145 | 11.35% | 10.33% | +1.20 |
| 5 or more | 8 | 0.63% | 1.02% | -1.40 |
SE is the gap between seen and predicted divided by one standard error. A biggest cluster of 3 is the commonest outcome and chance puts the same size first. The last row bundles every cluster of 5 and above, so it is large by construction and does not compete with the single sizes above it. Four rows are read here and none sits outside the range ordinary variation produces.
| Block | Wide | Drawn | Chance | SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 to 10 | 10 | 1,823 | 1,799.3 | +0.67 |
| 11 to 20 | 10 | 1,790 | 1,799.3 | -0.26 |
| 21 to 30 | 10 | 1,823 | 1,799.3 | +0.67 |
| 31 to 40 | 10 | 1,818 | 1,799.3 | +0.53 |
| 41 to 50 | 9 to 10 | 1,668 | 1,727.5 | -1.70 |
| 51 to 52 | 2 | 17 | 14.3 | +0.78 |
How many numbers each block has supplied in total, against what its size predicts over the same draws. A short block is predicted fewer numbers, not treated as missing them. None of the 6 blocks sits outside the range ordinary variation produces.
Recent trend last 100 draws, then blocks of 20
result for the blockrange ordinary variation allowsoutside that range
Each point is one block of 20 draws: the share of them whose biggest cluster reached three. The band is what chance predicts for those same draws, computed from their own pools, which is why it is not a flat line. A point outside the band is marked.
Applied to this draw draw 1277 · 2026-10-09
Its biggest cluster is 2, in each of the blocks from 01 to 10 and 21 to 30 , where chance predicted 2.67 for a draw from 52 numbers. No block of ten holds three of these numbers.
Over the last 100 draws the block furthest above its predicted total is 31 to 40, with 150 numbers against a predicted 137.1. Of its numbers, 31323334353637383940, one came up in draw 1277. Picking the leader of 5 blocks puts it above the average by definition, so the margin is a position, not a push. One block is held out of that ranking because the last 100 draws predict it fewer than 25 numbers, too few to read.
Related statistics
Share this page
If this report does not answer your question, tell us what you need and we will look at building it. Contact